It's not altered in anyway except for the conversion to. ( !SVggnBqS!rECVsi_FZlbVU91FaX073vp4xkKl9MyExx7MDji_G-k) is a download link for the raw DVD footage. It's a bit difficult to properly showcase the difference in visual quality without sacrificing some detail in the process, so I've decided to upload the two files separately. Next up we've got 30 seconds of footage from book 1. Notice: The color is a bit off right now, but that will get fixed before we export everything. There's upscaling, line-thinning, sharpening and debanding just to name a few. To create this look, we applied several filters and effects. The difference is incredible, especially in the fourth screenshot. Switch tabs in the top-left corner to see the next comparison. Hover your mouse over the image to see the 1440x1080 upscaled version. Here's a great explanation by ( ) on how bitrate affects the look of your video.įirst off, I've uploaded five different screenshot-comparisons. We're aiming to render all 61 episodes in high quality, hence the somewhat large file size per episode. We're looking at a size of around 1000mb per episode. I thought I'd give you guys another teaser by sharing some more footage, along with several neat-looking screenshots.Ĭlear up some space on your hard drives, because this stuff is heading your way in the near future. It's been nearly three weeks since /u/brucethem00se first submitted ( ) regarding the progress of our ATLA remastering project. Since most video files are compressed in some way, my blanket statement could be somewhat confusing.PROJECT IS FINISHED. But you have a good point.Īnd you are correct, I should clarify that Final Cut does not like video that has been compressed for the web or DVD. Also, since DV is higher quality than DVD I haven’t seen the need to get even higher quality. Photo-JPEG is amazing – the only problem with ProRes is that files are 5-6 times bigger than DV, which causes a problem for some. Larry replies: An excellent opinion – I’ll add it to the newsletter. Speaking of MPEG-2, I know what you mean, but this might be a little confusing. Oh and you also say, Final Cut doesn´t like compressed video. For me, ProRes is the new Photo JPEG and I think with the increasing power of the maschines and the increasing performance and size of hard drives, there is really no need to use DV anymore (unless you have it on tape). In my experience you get much better results from the Photo JPEG 75% setting (of course you have to tweak the real time enabler file, otherwise editing is a real pain).Īnd now that there´s ProRes around, I really wouldn´t use that (Photo JPEG) either. I just read your January issue and you recommended to convert DVD material to DV for editing. However, one thing I don´t like, is that you seem to keep pushing the DV format. It would be better to convert this into DV using either DVDxDV or MPEG Streamclip, then edit the resulting file. Larry replies: Final Cut really does not like compressed video. I would of course want to avoid to recompress it again… Is it true? I will have to export it to be played on some kind of media player in MPEG-2 format. I have a friend who says it is possible to edit MPEG-2 directly in the timeline of FCP. I’m doing a project where we will have to use already compressed material from DVDs (also commercial DVDs but totally legal though, we will have all the rights cleared) because of timeframe and costs. Henrik Björlin, of Stockholm, Sweden, writes: [ This article was first published in the January, 2008, issue of
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |